Tennessee
Williams described The Glass Menagerie as
his first, and probably only, ‘quiet play’. It is without the hard edges and lacerating
animalism of Williams’ other great plays, A
Streetcar Named Desire and Cat On A
Hot Tin Roof. Menagerie is not a play energised by human passions, but
instead by nostalgia, sentimentality and the easy capriciousness of memory. Tom
Wingfield, the play’s narrator, introduces it as a ‘memory play’, a
non-naturalistic evocation of a long-ago chain of half-remembered events;
‘fact’, as Tom puts it, ‘in the guise of illusion’.
Director Adam Cook and designers
Victoria Lamb and Mark Pennington have taken Tom’s opening monologue as an
invitation to eschew a realistic aesthetic and to fashion in its place a
setting that is not quite dreamlike but shares the collaged ambiguities of
dreams. At the commencement of the action of the play, Tom, in the manner of a
grand illusionist, summons various sections of the Wingfield family’s St. Louis
apartment to appear, either flown in or propelled upwards through trapdoors.
The glass menagerie itself – Laura Wingfield’s luminous, anthropomorphised hideaway
– appears downstage left in a pool of light, its place as the play’s principal
symbol beyond doubt from the get go. It’s tempting to think all this makes too
much of Tom’s explanation of what the audience is about to see, that Cook and
Lamb have insufficient faith in us to make sense of his world, but the effect
is so enchanting that it makes the decision feel like a correct, even
necessary, one. (The only misstep is the later appearance of an illuminated
sign for the Paradise nightclub which is needlessly big and seems showy rather
than evocative).
Tom is played by Anthony Gooley
whose charming, if occasionally fussy, performance is a joy. Many of the play’s
best lines, and much of its poetry, are his, and it is a tribute to his
intelligence as an actor that he almost always allows the words themselves to
breathe. It is difficult, in fact, to find fault in any of the performances;
Deidre Rubenstein is marvellously imperious as Amanda Wingfield (a part which
may be seen as a prototype of Williams’ other unforgettably wretched Southern
belle, Blanche Dubois); Kate Cheel, not long out of drama school, is an
exquisite Laura, giving a clear, affecting performance devoid of cliché; Nic
English, the play’s near-mythological ‘gentleman caller’, is funny and
charismatic, able as well to modulate his outward gloss when it is called for.
All four actors accomplish a brilliant balancing act, allowing just enough of
their own light to illuminate Williams’ words without sacrificing their
individuality as performers; these are among the best performances I have seen
in a State Theatre production for a very long time.
If The Glass Menagerie’s fine
performances and elegant design combine to cast a powerful theatrical spell –
which I think they do – then it is broken only by Stuart Day’s chintzy score. I
could have done with more period music (lovely 1930s tenement jazz) and less of
Day’s attempts to evoke the titular menagerie through an unsuccessful
synthesised approximation of a glass harp. Hideous, distracting stuff, and
entirely at odds with Tom’s musings at the top of the play about the way in
which memories always seem to be set to music (of, we imagine, a romantic and
sentimental kind, rather than a cloying and heavy-handedly emblematic one).
Adam Cook’s record-breaking tenure
as State Theatre Company’s artistic director comes to an end with The Glass Menagerie. He has never much
impressed me as a director – his well-known fondness for the flamboyant having
led, I think, to too many insubstantial (and in some cases disastrously
misjudged) productions – but I am pleased that his final show is a good one,
perhaps even the best he has directed during his seven years at State Theatre
Company’s helm. Cook tends to give his audiences surfaces, good-looking
surfaces perhaps, but not much depth all the same; where The Glass Menagerie succeeds is in revealing more than just its
pretty exterior. Cook, and his first-rate cast, are equal in the end to
Williams’ great play, unafraid and more than capable of fleshing out its just-buried
poetry with all the wit and grit that is required.
(Only one question remains: why no
one is seen to smoke in this production. Surely an exemption from the
anti-smoking laws would have been expedient for a play set in 1930s America in
which at least one character is evidently a heavy smoker).
No comments:
Post a Comment